Visit MargaretPerry.org

Visit MargaretPerry.org
The Great Katharine Hepburn has relocated to margaretperry.org, where you will find even more amazing reviews and commentaries on films from the classic era to today!
Showing posts with label Lucille Ball. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lucille Ball. Show all posts

03 May 2014

10 Things to Love about WITHOUT LOVE (1945)

WI poster

Harold S. Buquet's WITHOUT LOVE (1945) is without doubt one of Katharine Hepburn's most underrated films. She plays a Jamie Rowan, a scientist's daughter who rents out part of her Washington DC home to a Pat Jamieson (Spencer Tracy), a scientist who cannot find anywhere to live and work due to the housing shortage of WWII DC. Jamie has given up on love because she tragically lost her first husband, and cannot envision loving anybody else. Pat refuses to have any romance in his life because he has been jilted by the girl he was crazy about. So, the obvious conclusion for this mismatched pair is to enter into a loveless marriage and work together as colleagues on the scientific innovations that will win the war. Well, if you've EVER seen a Hepburn/Tracy movie in your life, you can imagine the laughs these two have before yielding to the inevitable and falling hook, line, and sinker for each other!

special creation
"You don't want love in your life, I don't want it in mine. But our reasons are as different as the sun is from the moon. You don't want it because you've had all the worst of it. I don't want it because I've had all the best." (Jamie)
As philosophical as this all sounds, the movie is actually rather light, and full of laughs. Hepburn is as good here as she is in some of her more popular comedies, like BRINGING UP BABY (1938), THE PHILADELPHIA STORY (1940), or ADAM'S RIB (1949). If you haven't seen it already, WITHOUT LOVE is definitely one to add to your collection. Here are my top ten favorite things about the movie.

29 June 2013

When Comedy Was Queen: The Women of the 1950s Sitcom

funny ladiesThis post was written in conjunction with the Funny Lady Blogathon, hosted by Fritzi Kramer at Movies Silently. This article and many more film/feminist-related articles by may be found at margaretperry.org.
“You've heard it before: Women aren't funny. The opinion has been appearing and reappearing in various guises for decades... But few assertions are easier to prove than this one. It's as simple as saying that women make us laugh.” (We Killed 3)

“Women have always been funny. It's just that every success is called an exception and every failure an example of the rule. (We Killed 5)
Women have been active participants in history since the dawn of time (Who Cooked the Last Supper?), and the world of comedy is no exception. When looking back over the history of entertainment, who is the earliest comedienne you can think of? Fanny Brice immediately comes to mind. I am also reminded of Charlie Chaplin's leading lady Edna Purviance. No doubt there are many examples of funny ladies from Hollywood's Golden Age - let's not forget our very own Katharine Hepburn in such films as BRINGING UP BABY (1938) and THE PHILADELPHIA STORY (1940).

But what of television's golden age? Were women funny in an era when the happy housewife was the glorified ideal of American femininity? You bet your bloomers they were!
“The women featured here headlined their own sitcoms and were the top-billed stars of those shows. These actresses and their characters were the primary laugh-getters on some of the most highly rated sitcoms of the 1950s, shows that were noteworthy not only for their popularity, but for their innovation and creativity in the then-young medium of television.” (The Women Who Made Television Funny)
Many of television's first sitcoms were holdovers from radio. Husband and wife comedies like Ozzie and Harriet, Fibber McGee and Mollyand George Burns and Gracie Allen all enjoyed profound success on the airwaves before appearing on the small screen. Despite Beatrice Arthur's later comment that the women of these shows were "just a bubblehead out to get laughs," each earned professional respect as a comedienne in her own right.

This was certainly true of what I like to call "The Big Three" of early television comedy: Lucille Ball, Eve Arden and Betty White. The popularity of these comediennes, obtained independent of their male co-stars, has endured to today.

08 August 2012

POLL: What's your favorite Katharine Hepburn WWII movie?

1.) WOMAN OF THE YEAR (1942)
Sam teaches Tess baseball. She catches on fairly quickly.
In Hepburn's first ever film with Spencer Tracy, she plays high-flying political journalist Tess Harding and he is lowly sports writer Sam Craig on the same newspaper. Although at first the two clash ideologically, they quickly fall in love and marry. The couple struggles to stay together as Tess (Hepburn) continues to rate her job as a higher priority than her marriage. One of the strongest portrayals of a successful business woman on the big screen.

14 July 2012

Feminist Star Personas of Classic Hollywood (other than Katharine Hepburn)

http://feministguidetohollywood.blogspot.com/
Feminist personas of classic Hollywood come in many shapes and sizes. Some, like the great Katharine Hepburn, found profound new ways to represent strong women on the big screen. Others more subtly broke new ground in their private lives. There is no set way to define a feminist icon, but there are some ways you can measure how progressive the stars' personas could be. For one, all of these women are professionals who get paid (a lot) for their talent and hard work. Secondly, stars who were aware of their desire to present a progressive view of women often chose films which would showcase these strengths.


02 July 2012

STAGE DOOR (1937): A Feminist Perspective

Because Katharine Hepburn’s star text in so many of her film roles reads as a liberated feminist, the audience becomes tempered to the idea of whole groups of women being autonomous. Before STAGE DOOR (1937), she had made such films as CHRISTOPHER STRONG (1933), LITTLE WOMEN (1933), ALICE ADAMS (1935), MARY OF SCOTLAND (1936), and A WOMAN REBELS (1936), all playing autonomous and powerful women. By 1937 her particular brand of female independence had been accepted by the general public to the point that it became something attractive rather than repulsive. Therefore, the film text is able to portray communities which highlight this new type of empowerment because her star text has already proved its possibility and potential.
In the famous moth costume for CHRISTOPHER STRONG (1933)
These communities of women have a unique departmentalized position in relation to the society in which they function. In Gregory La Cava's STAGE DOOR (1937), the community is almost completely separate from the rest of society; the actresses, because of their choice of profession, are exceptions to the traditional gender roles of society, although they are not entirely exempt from the pressures of those societal expectations. By the 1930s, actresses had been accepted by society as commodities necessary for the continuation of a profession very important to that society: the field of entertainment. The romanticism of the stage had caught fire while audiences witnessed the blossoming of the Golden Age of Hollywood. 
Director Gregory La Cava works on a scene with Hepburn and Gingers Rogers
However, the women in STAGE DOOR have been departmentalized in that they are put into a community of their own rather than integrated into the traditional societal structure. The women cannot be wives and actresses at the same time. Nor can Hepburn’s character be a daughter and an actress. Their relationship to society is one of complete marginalization. Because they reject the traditional heterosexual relationship structure, they must find a substitute for what that structure fails to provide – professional support. This support is supplemented by the energies of the female group.
            STAGE DOOR presents the audience with a group of more liberated women. Like the rest of the country, the theatre district was hurt by the Depression and the women who had chosen a life independent of a husband and family instead struggle with the alternative. 1930s audiences connected to this film in a number of ways. Susan Ware notices that “the snappy tone of Stage Door is in keeping with the self-confidence of the screwball comedies which flourished in the 1930s, bringing comic relief to their Depression-weary audiences” (Ware 184). The rhetoric of the community of women both reflects and relieves the dominant emotions of the country at the time.

Rogers and Hepburn outwit Adolphe Menjou
The male characters in STAGE DOOR hold a rather ambivalent place within the film text. They are seen mostly as unnecessary necessities. Although the men hold the upper hand in the business, and though marriage seems to be a logical alternative to professionalism for many of the women, the men fail to manipulate this group of women who have chosen to excuse themselves from the expectations of patriarchy. The incredulity of the idea that Hepburn’s character could be manipulated by any male characters is promulgated by Hepburn’s star text. The audience reads her character as one who is independent of the pressures endured by the other members of the female group. Her character must be strongly independent in order to support and sustain the legitimacy of that group. If every member of the group is continually trapped, manipulated, and defeated by the patriarchal order, it has no reason for existing and the argument for female independence from men must disintegrate. The audience’s understanding of the Hepburn text as independent and autonomous substantiates the continuation of the group while simultaneously discrediting the patriarchal community of the film.
Hepburn, Lucille Ball, and Ginger Rogers
STAGE DOOR is unique in that today’s audience is able to retrospectively apply reading of the star texts of other member of the cast besides Hepburn: “[the film] is also related, through the brilliant repartee of its dialogue, and the presence of an extraordinary array of distinguished female comic actors (Ginger Rogers, Eve Arden, Lucille Ball, Phyllis Kennedy), to ‘thirties comedy” (Britton 71). Two of these women, Eve Arden and Lucille Ball, eventually come to epitomize two forms of American womanhood in the twentieth century, particularly the 1950s. Eve Arden’s most starring role as Miss Brooks in the TV and radio program “Our Miss Brooks” (1949-1956) is the essence of the witty spinster-schoolteacher. More famously, Lucy Ricardo in “I Love Lucy” became the image of the American housewifery. STAGE DOOR seems almost prescient when one realizes that Eve Arden’s character has lines like “I’ll never put my trust in males again,” and Lucille Ball’s character is the only one of the female group who gets married.
Eve Arden's (far right) wit
These two personas provide the bridge of our understanding of star text between the 1930s and the 1950s. When the nation’s heroes returned from World War II, the women of America returned to hearth and home to take care of their families. However, as Eugenia Kaledin points out in her book Mothers and More: American Women in the 1950s, “When Rosie the Riveter handed her goggles to the men who were returning from World War II, she did not rush to put on an apron.” Although women hoping to return to work faced open public hostility, many women who had had a taste of independence through careers were not so keen to spend the rest of their lives in the kitchen.
The research department in DESK SET (1957)
Katharine Hepburn, Joan Blondell, Sue Randall, and Dina Merrill
Because of the extreme gender departmentalization of the job market, “men rarely replaced women in the vacated jobs” (Ware 28). Women became respected for their unique skills, characterized by efficiency, meticulousness, and dexterity, thus forming an “important group of loyal and conscientious producers” (Kaledin 66-67). Just such a group is presented in DESK SET (1957). The women in the community of the research department at the Federal Broadcasting Company have certainly “identified with the heritage of alienation that ultimately enriches mainstream culture; they turned their frustrations into creative energy” (Kaledin iv). These women are so prodigious that they have become invaluable to the company and to the patriarchal society at large which has tried to segregate them into more conservative roles as wives and mothers. Stay tuned for a post about the community of women in DESK SET.


ShareThis