I apologize, dear reader, for taking this autobiographical sidetrack from classic movies. It is not my habit to use this blog to discuss my personal views. That said, I was led this morning to write this article about feminism. I do not mean to offend anybody with my views and this is not a political rant, by any means. It is simply a metacognitive look at how I became a feminist. It is kind of Katharine Hepburn's fault, so I have allowed myself to publish it here. I am not offended if you are not in the least bit interested. Staye tuned for more posts about classic film history after this!
Although I consider myself a feminist now, I have not
always done so. I was raised in a fairly respectable middle class family; my
parents are conservative and they raised my brother and me to share their
views, without actually forcing them upon us. Bill Clinton was always referred
to as “Slick Willy” at our dinner table, and after 9/11 we put up our American
flag and supported George Bush 100%. But then the United States invaded Iraq I
thought, “Now, wait a minute. Where are you going with this one, W.?” At college
two professors in particular had a profound effect on my political education.
One was liberal and one was conservative, and I am so grateful to both of them
for being such just, fair, open-minded individuals as they encouraged me to cultivate
my own political views.
When I read Katharine Hepburn’s autobiography (Me, 1996) in my sophomore year in college,
I found myself as interested in her progressive upbringing as in her film
career. Hepburn’s mother, Katharine Houghton Hepburn, was orphaned at sixteen,
yet still managed to put herself and her younger sisters through Bryn Mawr College. Both she and her sister Edith threw themselves into progressive reform
work after graduation and marriage. They worked tirelessly for woman suffrage
and birth control, taking what they had learned at Bryn Mawr to help raise the
standard of women’s rights.
As I began studying Progressive Reform Era feminism (1st
wave feminism), I felt myself becoming more sympathetic with the feminist,
gender, and sexuality issues of my own time. Frankly, I am not terribly interested
in politics, as such; the mud-slinging, back-stabbing, and corruption that goes
on in government bores the brains out of me. But I am a compassionate
individual who likes to make informed decisions based on my highest sense of
right. Sometimes this means I support the liberals, sometimes the
conservatives. But I will always support the women’s movement.
Diana Rigg as Emma Peel "The Avengers" |
Last night I was surfing YouTube when I came across a
segment of an interview Diana Rigg had given with Mark Lawson in 2011, in which
she discusses her views on feminism. I am a big fan of Rigg in “The Avengers”
(1965-1968) and the “Mrs. Bradley Mysteries” (1998-2000), and my friends and I
have always thought of her as a sort of prototype feminist in these roles.
However, in the 2011 interview, Rigg takes a rather ambivalent stance on
feminism. On the one hand she says, “The [feminist] issue is quite simple. Within yourself you are an
individual and you are free. You are a free
individual.” Agreed. The she goes on to define the feminist movement (of
the 1960s): “The only fetters that the feminists have are the economic fetters.
And once we have parity with men, which we do in my profession, I’ve got no
gripe at all.”
Similar views on feminism, and the feminist movement, have
been shared by other individuals whom many consider feminist figures. Katharine
Hepburn rejected being associated with feminism in her 1973 interview with DickCavett, saying, “We did that, many years ago.” In Bette Davis’s interview with
Cavett, she accepted his offer to light her cigarette, stating, “I’m not women’s
lib.”
One may be taken aback, as I was, hearing these women, who
had broken down so many gender barriers by living progressive professional and personal
lives, speak this way about the feminist movement. However, we must be clear
that these women are no less feminist figures simply because they rejected the
feminist movement of their own time. In
the first place, the feminist movement of the time was misunderstood in many
respects. Secondly, the movement has evolved to have different priorities in a
different age. Finally, feminism in any form will always be misunderstood by
much of society. This is what feminists are working to change.
1st wave feminism or Progressive Reform Era feminism refers to the social movement of
the late-19th and early-20th century involving the fight
for woman suffrage, property rights, and to a lesser extent birth control
rights. The 2nd wave feminist movement of the late 1960s through the
1970s was instrumental in achieving gender parity in the workplace, in
politics, and in society in general. The feminists of the 1960s could be
extremely radical, and the negative implications associated with the term “feminism”
can often be traced back to this era.
The most recent swelling of feminist activity is being
termed 3rd wave feminism. Today’s feminist movement covers a broader
scope of individuals, adopting a diversity of social issues including race/ethnicity
and queer theory. The general goal of 3rd wave feminism is to
actively realize the potentials made possible by the preceding feminist
movements. This means not only supporting the middle-class white woman, but
also women of mixed races, women living in poverty, and women in developing
countries. The expectations for wealthy western societies are also heightened as
feminists realize how little the achievements of the earlier feminist movements
are being manifested in the most supposedly “advanced” countries, like the
United States and Great Britain.
All of these objectives are worth fighting for. Although
women have certainly advanced by leaps and bounds throughout the 20th
century, it would be naïve to believe that the work is concluded, that women have
achieved complete equality with men in every field. The problem now, as before,
is convincing a society of individuals that women should be 100% equal with men. First we must recognize that women
are not currently treated as equal. Then we must believe that they should be equal. Then we must lay down
the ground rules that establish women as equals. Finally, we must live the full
potential allowed by those rules. Only when all of these steps are embraced by
the majority of the population will true gender/sexual equality be realized.
The way I see it, the root of the problem (gender inequality)
is in how we define the expectations of gender in our individual consciousness.
Let’s look at how society defines gender for us. The biggest influence is in
home life. What do the men and women within your home do? How do they behave?
What do they expect of themselves and of each other? The second biggest
influence are the external factors which enter the home by way of media and
literature. How is gender defined by what we see on TV, in movies, and in the magazines
on our coffee table? The third influential force would be in our educational
system, and so on and so forth. Eventually, we start to make decisions based on
what we have seen and been told. We either choose to perpetuate the norm, or we
deliberately become the change we wish to see.
There are an infinite number of character traits floating
around our consciousness. Some traits have positive connotations while others
are much more negative. Many of these qualities are gendered. The disparity
comes when the value of a certain character trait varies based on the gender to
which it is being applied. For example, “gentleness” as a word is positive. When
it is applied to the female, it adopts an almost holy status. But it is not an
encouraged characteristic in the male. When applied to a masculine subject, it
becomes more closely associated with the more negative traits, like “weakness” and
“cowardice.” Another example could be “decisiveness.” A decisive man is praised
for his forthrightness, but a decisive woman is often called “bitchy.”
These definitions of gender expectations are unfair to both
sexes. I dream of a world when strength is encouraged in both men and women.
Will there come a day when both genders can show unconditional compassion
without compromising their sexuality? Every day I go to pick up the kids I
babysit from school. I stand on the playground with dozens of moms and wonder
how many of them would rather be at work and how many of their husbands would
rather be here collecting the kids. Maybe they are perfectly content. Maybe
they don’t know that they would rather be in the other position because it
never occurred to them to consider it. Perhaps they are satisfied because they
feel, albeit unconsciously, they are properly fulfilling the expectations put
upon them by society.
When I look at the images of Marilyn Monroe (above) that have become
so iconic, I see a talented, intelligent young woman who has died her hair
blond, put on a bathing suit, and thrust out her chest in order to find success
in the world, and I think, “I want more than that.” I want more for her, as
well as for myself, my friends, my mother, my children. I look at Katharine
Hepburn and her mother and I think, “By gum, she is pretty damned close to what
I want all women to be able to achieve!” As in any model, there are flaws. But
the more role models we hold before us, the better we can develop our own sense
of gender identity, and encourage others to reach higher.
As we promote progressive images of gender, the more those
images will become reality. By the other token, every time a woman is
objectified in the media we take five steps backward. Think of it this way: if
every joke on TV about an effeminate man meant that a little boy got bullied at
school for wearing pink, would you laugh as hard? If every commercial where a
woman’s breasts are used to sell a product meant a teenage girl got raped on
the way home from school, would you buy that product? Please, think about what
concepts of gender identity you are allowing into your conscience. Take the
time to examine how you view yourself and those around you. Then please, please, make informed decisions about
what you do, how you behave, and how you vote. Remember that everything you do can
either perpetuate or progress the current state of things. And above all, live with
compassion.
Further reading:
This is probably my favorite thing you've ever written. It's a fantastic article, very thorough and makes very good points. Feminism is very dear to my heart, it has always been, I was lucky enough to grow up in a liberal family like Katharine's, that encouraged me go out and seek my own future, regardless of what society expected of my gender. And when I made the decision of not having any children, I was, despite misunderstood by the general society surrounding me, very respected by my parents. I know I'm young, but I already know that I have no interest in spending the rest of my life raising a family. I respect women who do, but it's not what I want, and I am unlucky to be born at a time that still doesn't regard that with full normality.
ReplyDeleteI think Hepburn and Davis denied being feminists because they denied being icons of anything at all. They couldn't be anti-feminists or even not believe in the feminist ideals and be the way they were (especially Hepburn). There's a quote of Davis' that I adore that says "My greatest trouble is to reconcile the woman nature expects me to be with the woman that I am." They are both such role models to me.
Again, thank you so much for writing this. I had a great time reading it and I definitely will take it with me as a lesson.
Marcela, thank you so much for sharing your story here. I agree with what you say about Davis and Hepburn - I would say that's also true for Diana Rigg and many other actresses. I am so pleased you liked this post!
Delete"A decisive man is praised for his forthrightness, but a decisive woman is often called “bitchy.” " It's so true. Well said, Margaret. As a male, this was never really on the forefront of my awareness, especially as a child. In my early-20's, I dated a feminist and it was eye opening. The double-standards became very clear and I was initially ashamed that I'd never noticed them before. I was introduced to new writers and artists and saw the achievements in such small things as Katherine Hepburn wearing slacks.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the other poster, this is one of your best pieces. :)
Thank you! It is nice to hear about a guy who was willing to really listen to his girlfriend. Don't feel too ashamed about not noticing it - I didn't at first. We mustn't get too caught up in how far we've come, but must continue to look for what still needs to be done. Thanks for commenting!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing this, Margaret. Wonderful, personal expression of your journey. As a woman who made a choice not to have children, I am more often than I'd like, to be honest, confronted with attitudes of "a wasted life." I do not regret my decision but that is a reminder of how much further society needs to go in accepting and valuing women as forces beyond what has been designed as "proper". We should not be limited to anyone's expectations.
ReplyDeleteI will add that this year's election is historic most for what's at stake for us. Without telling anyone what's right or wrong, it is vital that Americans, women in particular, are well informed about what's at stake.
Aurora
Aurora, thanks so much for your two cents - always welcome! I agree that this election is pivotal in regards to women's issues, which is perhaps why I have become more interested than in previous elections. Thanks for commenting!
DeleteMargaret, this is a wonderful article. I was lucky enough to grow up in a progressive, liberal family like Kate's ("Republican" was a dirty word in our house!) and we were raised to be proud of being female. I was definitely brought up to be a feminist, but in my adulthood I consider myself an egalitarian, and don't particularly like the word "feminist" because it sounds like women are now being treated as higher than men, which is equally unfair. And I agree with Citizen Screen above in that women need to be aware of just how much is at stake in this election. We're in danger of taking a gigantic step backwards in women's rights.
ReplyDeleteLara
It is a bit concerning how close we are to undoing a lot of the good progress women have made in the last 100 years! I agree that the word "feminist" presents a number of problems, not least of which is that we are really dealing with problems of gender, both genders, rather than just the advancements of women. Thanks for commenting!
Delete